press enter »
placeholder
placeholder

NGOs denied legal standing to contest Aħrax/Miżieb deal
NGOs denied legal standing to contest Aħrax/Miżieb deal

NGOs denied legal standing to contest Aħrax/Miżieb deal

Tista' taqra bil- Malti . A group of non-governmental organisations were denied legal standing in a case before the Tribunal for Administrative Review where they are contesting a controversial deal that handed the woodland areas of Aħrax and Miżieb to the Federazzjoni Kaccaturi Nassaba Konservazzjonisti. People protest in disapproval of Miżieb government

Environmental NGOs Denied Legal Standing To Contest Controversial Mellieħa Woodlands Deal

Environmental NGOs Denied Legal Standing To Contest Controversial Mellieħa Woodlands Deal

A group of environmental NGOs were denied legal standing to contest a controversial deal that handed the woodland areas of Aħrax and Miżieb to the Federazzjoni Kaccaturi Nassaba Konservazzjonisti. According to the NGOs, the administrative tribunal concluded that the concerned parties did not qualify as “aggrieved persons” due to them not being notified

Activists' plans to contest Aħrax, Miżieb woodlands deal hits a legal snag

Activists' plans to contest Aħrax, Miżieb woodlands deal hits a legal snag

Environmental NGOs contesting a secretive deal which handed management of the Aħrax and Miżieb woodlands to hunting group FKNK have been denied legal standing by an administrative tribunal. The ruling, which NGOs say they intend to appeal, means the activists are unable to contest the Lands Authority decision to sign away the two Mellieħa woodland

NGOs to pursue further procedures to obtain legal standing in Ahrax/Mizieb court case

NGOs to pursue further procedures to obtain legal standing in Ahrax/Mizieb court case

NGOs and individuals contesting the Ahrax and Mizieb deal signed between the Lands Authority and FKNK, intend to appeal a ruling of the Tribunal for Administrative Review, as they were denied legal standing in the case being heard before the Tribunal. The Tribunal decided that the parties contesting the deal did not qualify as 'aggrieved persons' under